StudyBoss » Manipulation In Othello And Dr. Faustus

Manipulation In Othello And Dr. Faustus

The art of deception many times changes the current conditions or plays a significant role in the end result of literary works. In Othello and The Tragical History of Dr. Faustus shows how deception changes the identity of individuals and the outcome of certain events. There is a juxtaposition between the characters of Iago and Faustus, whom use their human autonomy to manipulate the sequence of events in each work.

By deceiving themselves or the characters around them there becomes an absolute play on words and actions, wherein the identity and outcome is strengthened or lost. Iago wishes to be Othello and this becomes apparent in his discussion regarding Cassio promotion, his social status, and his own identity. Iago seems to deceive himself, by wishing he were Othello and by doing so he almost believes he is Othello. Shakespeare states: Were I the Moor I would not be Iago, begins Iago abolishing his own identify to fulfill his desires to be another person (line 58).

Stephen Greenblatt discusses the possible meanings of Iago role-playing briefly in Act 1 and states: Were I the Moor, I would not be Iago, because The I always loves itself nd the creature I know as Iago hates the Moor he serves or, alternatively, because of the Moor I would be other than I am now, free of tormenting appetite and revulsion that characterize the servants relation to his master and that constitutes my identify as Iago. (235-36) Iago appears to manipulate his own thoughts regarding Othello and by doing so it directs him as to what identity he holds.

By imaging himself as Othello he is able to see the opposing outcomes of himself in regards to Othello, therefore he construct his own identity by furthering his manipulation. Iago deception is furthered in his conversation with Roderigo and states: But I will wear my heart upon my sleeve/For daws to peck at, I am not what I am, showing hes not what he appears to be ( line 65-66). Iagos language and words make you believe he is noble and a friend, but the underlining cause of his actions are because his emotions and identity are being effected.

Iago submits to his own beliefs he has lost himself, but he chooses to make other believe otherwise in his statements. Greenblatt refers to Iagos purpose of being of self-interest and his self-interests were disguised by wearing a mask nd deceiving the people around him (236). Iago at times act as Othellos friend, but his reasoning are to bring him down socially and emotionally. Othello was befriended by Iago in Act 1, when Iago is leading Brabantio to Othello whom has took his daughter as his wife.

Iago states: I must show out a flag and sign of love/Which is indeed but sign. That you will surely find him, where Iago is planning to set Othello up so that Brabantio can accuse him of wrongdoing. Again Iago is deceitful, by saying his love was but a sign and ultimately leading Brabantio to confront Othello on their marriage. Iagos love here is not real and he acts as if he cares for Othello only to make a criminal out of him. In Scene 2 Brabantio is deceived by Iago for the mere fact that Othello is a colored individual, thus strengthening Iago perception of himself.

As he belittles Othello and talks of his unacceptable marriage to Desdemona, he understand by doing so he is increasing his chances of being respected by others. The matter is brought up in court and Iagos plan was working as he had thought, but again Iago is shunned socially because of Othellos reputation as a good fighter and a war has broken out. The matter seems to be forgotten in the time of crisis, therefore Iago has to come up with another plan to gain his identity back. Within Scene 3, Desdemona is pleading with her father that she and Othello are misrepresented by others and that they do love each other.

She thinks of herself as the victim, but her father disagrees because of Iagos deception of Othellos character. Brabantio believes she is wrong and states: These sentences, to sugar or to gall, Being strong on both sides, are equivocal. But words are words, I never yet did hear. That the bruised heart was pierced through the ear(line 219-22). Brabantio believes it was not heresy that effected his heart, it was the mere action of her marrying this man that made him upset. It was deception and a play on words that gives her father notions that Othello was not suitable for her daughter.

Iagos desire to be Othello and revenge him becomes very apparent, yet he believes he has a solid claim to his words, actions, and thoughts. At the close of Scene 3, Iago is trying to show Roderigo that people make themselves what they are and this all depends on the persons will. Iago actually believes he has a control on his ill and states: Our bodies are our gardens, to which our wills are the gardeners, which relates to his appetite for identity (line 316-17). Greenblatt states: Confident in his shaping power, Iago has the role-players ability to imagine his nonexistence so that the can exist for a moment in another as another (235).

In the second act the audience can see more deceptive measures on the part of Iago, which gave further grief to the other characters within this work. Iago convinces Roderigo that Desdemona actually loves Cassio. His claims are because he hates Cassio nd wants to further the emotional turmoil he has put on Othello. Greenblatt discusses the reasoning for this and states: He has no evidence, of course-indeed we have earlier seen him engender the whole plot entirely out of his fantasy-but he proceeds to lay before the gull of all circumstances that make this adultery plausible. (234).

This would relate to how she first loved the Moor, but she desired something new like Cassio who was younger, accepted socially, and handsomer (line 215). Although his claims are not justified nor true, Iago proceeds with his tales to gain atisfaction on lying and making others believe his words. For example, Iago using the expression by this hand he prove that his own invention grants him control. (line 238). Greenblatt describes this use of words by stating: The metaphor makes explicit what Iago has been doing all along, constructing a narrative into which he inscribes (by this hand) those around him.

He does not need a profound or even reasonably accurate understanding of his victims; he would rather deal in probable impossibilities than improbable possibilities. (234). Deception becomes very apparent in Scene 3, wherein Iago gets Cassio drunk and e persuades Roderigo to get him in a frenzy, thus he acts out of character. Iago creates an image that Cassio abuses alcohol and should be punished for his actions. Othello takes away Cassios ranking because of the scheme that Iago develops. Again Iago deception and manipulation of the event benefits him.

His deception becomes apparent in conversation with Montano and states: I had rather have this tongue cut from my mouth/Than it should do offense to Michael Cassio, which he pretends to care or love thee while carrying feelings of jealously still about him (lines 194-5; 221). Iagos play on words with Cassio like he has earlier to others in this work, but this time he brings Cassio and Desdemona closer. Iago states: hath devoted and given up himself, which says that Othello has structured his life and therefore she has all the power (line 272).

Iago manipulates the situation again having Desdemona talk to Othello, he feels that by her defending his honor he can convince Othello her love for Cassio is true. Iago states: And she for him pleads strongly to the Moor, Ill pour this pestilence into his ear, That she repeals him for her bodys lust, that being his main objective in his trickery. Iago sets the stage for interaction between Desdemona and Cassio in Act 3, he wants to make his claim be seen and to be acknowledge as true. He even enters his own wife into the confusion, her role becomes very important especially in Scene 3.

Iago shows proof of Othellos handkerchief in possession of Cassio in this scene, his deception of events and solid proof make his story more credible. He tells Othello of Cassios dreaming of his wife and then performing sexual actions on him as if he were Desdemona. He was not sure his deception was working, therefore he discusses the handkerchief again. This enrages Othello, the trickery is working and Othello is getting angry, he wishes for Cassio to be dead. As Iago brings these charges against Desdemona and Cassio, he manipulates Othellos mind to believing that he should kill his wife.

In the later acts the audience witness that Othello soon learns of the deception by Iago, but by this time it is too late. With Iagos constant reminders of adultery, the things that Othello learned about the two supposed lovers, and the feeling of being betrayed he had no other choice but to end his wifes life. Greenblatt states: Othellos identity is entirely caught up in the narrative structure that drives him to turn on Desdemona into a being incapable of pleasure, a piece of monumental alabaster,: so that he will at last be able to be able to love her without the taint of adultery. 251)

By Iago providing a continual story for Othello to believe, he makes him fall victim to the play on his words. Iago makes Othello become obsessed with this circumcised enemy who must be destroyed, thus Iagos deception played its part. Since the beginning of this work Iagos self-esteem is effected to the point of him reating this fantasy, but he too becomes a character within this work. He becomes the villain and he plays his part as he had made it for himself. He had stated earlier to Roderigo that people make themselves what they are, eventually he feel victim to the same story.

In Act 2 he states: I am about it, but indeed my own invention. /Comes from my pate as birdlime does from frieze, which refers to his own entrapment of his own illusion of this story (line 126-7). He is not only consumed with determining the actions and thoughts of others, he is consumed with how he plays a role as well. His perception of this play on words, actions, and deception play a significant role in determining his identity at the close of this work. Iagos manipulation of others determines his own worth and he finds he can not escape this fantasy he has developed.

By stripping the identities of the other characters, he too lost himself in the confusion and deception. As Greenblatt thinks of this play on words as submission to narrative self-fashioning, the audience can see Iago submits as well (234). By surrendering to the manipulation and deception he causes, he discovers his identity is no more determined han next person. Deception plays a key role in Marlowes The Tragical History of Dr. Faustus, the character of Faustus can be compared to the character of Iago in Othello.

Faustus dissatisfaction with life can also be related to Iagos unhappiness, which they deceive themselves and others to bring them to the another level of existence. By the play of words, Faustus creates an illusion much like Iago had done and therefore gets consumed in the drama that there appears to be no turning back. Faustus desire to be more knowledgeable than others becomes his downfall, his involvement in shaping his identity is o excessive he can not think otherwise. In Act One Scene 3, Faustus quest for knowledge is started with the introduction of the character Mephostophilis and he was sent for Faustus fear of God.

Mephostophilis does not force any thoughts on Faustus, he is merely a device that molds Faustus identity. What Mephostophilis does is allows to Faustus to make a decisions as to what he wants his life to be. In relation to Othello where Iago talks of people make themselves what they are, Faustus too makes himself a part of his own vision of what is to come. Faustus states: Now that I have obtained what I desire, Ill live in the speculation of this art, which shows where his creation and desires to be worldly become his main aspiration.

Stephen Greenblatt on Marlowes fascination of a person entering into a new world such as Faustus desired to be stated: The obvious effect is to enact the heros vision of a nature that Doth teach us all to have aspiring minds and of the soul that Wills us to wear ourselves and never rest, which related to the determination that Faustus had to manipulate is own mind that this new life would be beneficial and justifiable 194). His deception of his own mind is parallel to that of Iago, both characters appear to believe that what they are doing is justifiable.

The overwhelming thoughts of this fantasy appears to be the downfall of each character, because a departure of the events is not logical and surrendering to their own fantasy is logical and may times unavoidable. Faustus believes that his present state is unacceptable, he feels as if he can be more powerful by submitting his life to Satan. In the same sense he is not totally convinced that the destination of hell carries validity to himself. Mephostophilis guides him to believe otherwise by stating: Aye, think so still, till experience change thy mind (196).

As the work progresses we can see Faustus is not totally satisfied with the responses, which is another reason he is dedicated into manipulating his mind to bring about satisfaction that was not granted in Wittenberg. The problem that arises within Faustus is that he is consumed heavily in wanting to know more about this other life, he accepts nothing but learning what he lacks. In Scene 1 in Act Two, Faustus states: But tell me , hath every sphere a dominion or intelligentia, hich furthers his want of discovery within himself the answers of his identity (lines 52-3).

Greenblatt discusses Faustus infatuation about giving up everything, his desires are to fill his mind with new thoughts and new emotions. In comparison to the first section of the work, he gives up his life to seek a more satisfaction and needs to erase his past. By deleting his past, he allows himself to believe in his deception of what Hell could do for him. Greenblatt feels that Faustus does not reject his life, but he violates it many times to manipulate his thoughts into believing his life can be improved.

Greenblatt states: The violence arises not only from the desire to mark boundaries but from the feeling that what one leaves behind, turns away from, must no longer exist; that objects endure only for the moment of the act of attention and then are effaced that the next moment can not be fully grasped until the last is destroyed. (199)/ Faustus has a hard time doing this, but he does so to get to the point where he feels his life is worth something and his identity is strengthened by his thoughts and actions.

His belief was that earth was not his platform for existence, he through his own eception and the his involvement with demonic figures regards Earth not to be relevant to his being. His thoughts on earths important appear is in Act 3 in Scene one and says: That looking down, the earth appeared to me/No bigger than my hand in quantity, thus stating that earth had no relevance and he desired to convince himself Hell had importance (lines 72-73). Faustus by believing that this is his destiny, submits to the deception he constructed since the beginning of the work.

Ironically, his submission to the this other world can be thought of out of his hands, therefore his destiny has been predetermined. This other world controls him, thus supporting his manipulation of his own thoughts towards abolishing his current status. Within Act 4 in Scene 2, Faustus shows where he now assures himself of his identity and states : The Doctor stands prepared, by power of art, To cast his magic charms that shall pierce through/The ebon gates of ever-burning hell, this art is his own invention that he has created thus believes this is his purpose (lines 19-20).

Greenblatt relates his thoughts of deceiving himself to believe this was his purpose was because, Identity is a theatrical nvention that must be reiterated if it is to endure (201). Although Faustus has abolished his status on earth, it appears he still his not given the answers to what this other life will do for him ultimately. Mephostophilis again is a mechanism for guiding Faustus and does not assure that the quality of life is better in Hell, he tells Faustus that man can be saved by faith alone.

As the audience knows, he rebels against the teachings of God and becomes dissatisfied with what righteousness provided him. This righteousness is what he thinks made him simple or an average individual. Due o his own play against himself and the other characters not assuring him his decision was correct, he is mistrusting what has consumed his thoughts about giving up himself to demons. The reality is his alienation made him destructible in his actions, but also hurt his existence as an individual.

In Scene 5 of this act his uncertainties become apparent as Faustus says: Despair doth drive distrust into my thoughts. /Confound these passions with a quiet sleep, wherein death appears to eliminate any uncertainties about his being (lines 32-2). The stronger his claims are, the more his own manipulation brings his downfall to ctually understanding the importance of this other world and his identity. Faustus confusion lies solely on the fact that he is unfamiliar with his own presence, which is what Greenblatt refers to as repetition compulsion (200).

In the final Act of The Tragical History of Dr. Faustus the deception, the manipulation of himself, and the mental confusion Faustus feels his increased. Although he did not want to serve God and his world, he would not be in total control of what hell could offer his life and existence as well. He would not be independent of his ways, he would again be molded into aiding in Satans world. His own invention and free will of his situation destroyed him and for a rational and intelligent man, he created a illusion that was similar to his past existence on earth.

As the audience has witnessed his manipulation of himself, people, and occurrences he has been part of, they can all be seen as beneficial to his ego of being deceitful. In Act 4, he wishes to be introduced and deceive Helen of Troy, but his manipulation finally gets the better of him. He appears to care for her and states: Come, Helen, come give me my soul again, where he is seeing that he desires to show affection line 98). His soul has been lost with his interaction with this other world, but he thought this world would provide him more than what the other could offer.

His curiosity not only made him deceive himself, but it appeared to be too late when he discovered his appetite for love. There is a comparison between Iago and Faustus, there play on words and actions enslaved them into their fantasies. When Faustus realizes his mistake with selling his soul to the devil, he understands that he is damned by reason of his own infliction. For Faustus to find himself he took his ill and intelligence to gain his freedom and establish what he could not on earth.

He states: And what noise soever you hear, come not unto me, for nothing can rescue me, which again can be compared to the character of Iago who has tormented his own life while trying to locate his existence (lines 69-70). Greenblatt discovers that this repetition in Faustus actions makes him continue his quest, because he his judgments had gave him no other alternative. He tries to repent his sins and therefore his manipulation of his own mind is visible. Greenblatt provides why Marlowe has made Faustus dedicated to this exchange of his soul, he believes this is what shapes the identity of the individual.

He views that all objects of desire are fictions, theatrical illusions shaped by human subjects and those subjects are themselves fictions, fashioned to reiterate acts of self-naming (218-219). Faustus finds his faults in his deception and states: All beast are happy, for when they die/Their souls are soon dissolved in elements, But mine must live still to be plagued in hell, thus determining his illusion did not bring true gratification (lines 165-7). Within Othello and The Tragical History of Dr. Faustus shows were the haracters while playing on words and actions have dedicated themselves to play a major role in the outcome.

Iago was very consumed in the idea of revenge and wishing to be of higher status, but his involvement made him a subject to the surrendering that is included in his invention. Faustus too is very consumed in the idea of forgetting his own existence and wishing to be of higher power, but it is the very thing that steals away his existence and desire to be in control. Each character while manipulating the events in the works, have deceived not only the other character, but themselves and their quest to find the self.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.