On January 1, 1994, Canada, Mexico and the United States passed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Promoted to Congress by the Clinton administration, with the assurance that it would give rise to more jobs – exactly how many though, is not precisely known. Yet, according to the Journal of Commerce, the U. S. went from having a $5. 5 billion trade surplus with Mexico before NAFTA, to having a massive $16 billion trade deficit today.
At the same time, it is estimated that 400,000 Americans have lost manufacturing jobs because of NAFTA within the treaty’s first three years, that’s about the same number of jobs which have been created in the Mexican maquiladoras. Instead of sharing of the wealth and profit, one might think that there has been a big transfer of wealth from north to south of the border and that Mexican laborers have profited at the expense and torment of their American counterparts. The reality is that working conditions, wage, health and safety standards in Mexico have deteriorated.
One American employee for a steering-wheel plan made approximately $10. 46 per hour, compared to his Mexican counterpart, who makes about $0. 75 per hour. Within the agreement, it stated “the government of Canada, the government of the United Mexican States and the government of the United States of America resolved to establish a free trade area. ” In addition, NAFTA also determined to: Strengthen the special bonds of friendship and cooperation among the nations; Contribute to the harmonious development and expansion of world trade and provide a catalyst to broader international cooperation;
Create an expanded and secure market for the goods and services produced in their territories; Establish clear and mutually beneficial rules governing their trade; Create new employment opportunities, improve working conditions and living standards in their respective territories; Ensure a predictable commercial framework for business planning and investment. A very important section of NAFTA is the elimination of tariffs, which are charged for imports and exports within the three nations. Along with the eradication of tariffs, the agreement opened up enormous opportunities, creating a $6. illion GNP for the three countries.
So far, companies like Thompson Consumer Electronics, Jay Garment, Magne Tek, Uniroyal Goodrich and Breed Technologies have moved at least 107 plants in Indiana alone. To attempt mutual acceptance, NAFTA has presented readers with their goods and service overview. The following are short assessments that NAFTA provides: The food everyone eats is very important to every country, thus being our main source of consumption, NAFTA makes it easier for goods to be exported and imported with limited quotas throughout the years of operation. When NAFTA entered into force at least one half of the agricultural exports in Mexico became duty free.
This is a great advantage to the United States because it will be able to export as many goods into Mexico, gaining in not only trade, but in economics as well. Now, within the five years of NAFTA operation, the agreement states that most of the remaining tariffs will be eliminated. As the success continues the goal for NAFTA is to disintegrate nearly ninety five percent of the United States agricultural exports with Mexico. This is what is agreed on by the tenth year, and as a result many of Mexico’s import licenses will also be eliminated.
Increasing competitiveness, creating employment opportunities and reducing prices for consumers is what NAFTA will integrate for the automotive sector. This is not the only advantage NAFTA is creating; it is also taking part in the termination of Mexican Auto Decree. Which is leading to the elimination of the limits of sales from vehicles imported from the United States or Canada into Mexico. This makes stolen vehicles harder to sell to Mexican civilians. The Amendment to Trade Balancing will also contribute in reducing not only fifty percent on tariffs, but on auto parts from the United States.
Thus, Mexico will also allow Canada and the United States to invest in Mexican “national suppliers” of parts as well as in enterprises (Mexico Business, NAFTA). There is a problem, however, companies only wish to establish firms in the US or Canada but not in Mexico. With the North American Free Trade Agreement in effect, the United States and Canada have greater access to electricity, gas, petrochemical, energy services and equipment markets from Mexico. This allows for these three Northern countries to share and rely on each other for products that are essential to the everyday lives of their citizens.
Through open rules the United States and Canada have the opportunity to sell to PEMEX, the Mexican owned oil company. This gives the United States and Canada a chance to sell their product while also allowing Mexico to buy from its North American neighbors without any hassle or problems. All three nations will benefit from the free trade, which would have been a problem before. For Mexico, in particular the North American Free Trade Agreement will also reduce investments restrictions lifting previous restricted basic petrochemicals. Overall the program provides performance incentives, which are used on activities such as oil drilling.
On September of 1992, the United States, Mexico and Canada established the North American Commission on Environmental Cooperation. The main objective is, “to set in motion a process for sustained long term effective trilateral environmental cooperation” (Mexico Business, NAFTA). NAFTA does not support substances that deplete the Ozone Layer, such as Montreal Protocol. As presented in the agreement, investment requires the maintenance of stringent health, safety and environmental standards; in which, NAFTA plans to open up numerous opportunities for environmental equipment, firms and services.
The plan is to provide companies which will increase environmental protection such as: solid waste disposal technology, sewage treatment, wastewater treatment, hazardous and non-hazardous waste engineering consulting, water treatment, specialized monitoring services and overall environmental rehabilitation. If these companies are not provided, it could mean harm for our ecology and democracy. The United States, Canada and Mexico have all been benefiting through the agreement of the North American Free Trade Agreement.
In Financial Services, the agreement has helped each member of the party acquire help with different companies, which in return make possible many consumer activities. An advantage to many of the Mexican consumers that cross the border everyday for goods and services is having the security of being able to rely on Mexican banks in operation here in the United States. In Return, Mexico will permit Canada and the United States to establish subsidiaries to engage in consumer opportunities for example, commercial lending, mortgage lending and the provision of credit cards.
This will not only establish a market share, but will emphasize on national treatment. Another key element from the North American Free Trade Agreement is that the United States and Canada, which are involved in trade with Mexico, will be able to take advantage of “one stop shopping,” both domestic and international operations. (Mexico Business, NAFTA) NAFTA enables the United States and Canadian firms to squeeze into Mexico’s billion dollar insurance markets. On the other hand the agreement between these three parties also states that market sharing will enable Mexico to form subsidiaries without ownership.
United States exports on pharmaceutical products to Mexico and Canada reached, six hundred and forty five billion and one hundred and twenty one million in 1991. With these growing numbers every year, NAFTA has allowed Mexico to remove import licenses, eliminating tariffs on these products. Today these pharmaceutical products play a big role on the everyday lives of many citizens of the three parities; therefore along with the elimination of tariffs, NAFTA is also increasing patent protection. According to the agreement Mexico should open up to receive these products with open arms. Sanitary and Photo sanitary measures:
Under the agreement, each country is entitled to establish its own measures as long as they are based on scientific principle and risk assessment. Rules may not be established to exercise unfair discrimination, or to serve distinguished restriction on trade. Overall the establishment must focus on protection of human, animal, and plant life, as well as standards for health risks due to animal pest or plant diseases, food additives, or food contaminants. Canada’s two hundred and fifty billion and Mexico’s one hundred and forty six billion service markets are now within easier access to the United States, liberalizing trade related services.
The elimination of a provider establishing a local presence is also vanished with NAFTA. Nevertheless, although NAFTA does not focus on basic telephone services, it does focus on advanced data processing while keeping the desire to maintain open international shipping markets. It is expected that by the year 2000 telecommunication products will be expected to grow to forty two percent, for this reason Mexico is expected to remove all tariffs on telecommunication equipment imports into their country.
These changes also increase the quantity of United States exports on telecommunications equipment and enhanced services. With the movement toward future compatibility, incorporate telecommunication services can be operated in the United States, Mexico, and Canada without transport networks or services from other parties. Fibers, yarns, textiles and clothing are all covered under the North American Free Trade Agreement. Under the agreement, the United States, Mexico and Canada, have focused on the rules of origin.
One of them in particular states that yarns as well as fabrics in a garment must be produced in one of the three countries, United States, Mexico, or Canada. This is done in order to take advantage of removing import quotas on textile, apparel goods, and also on goods produced in Mexico. In 1991 the six point four billion Mexican textile and apparel market is introduced with the North American Free Trade Agreement, which also takes part in the United States exports of one point one billion.
With this change the North American Free Trade Agreement immediately vanished Mexican barriers up to twenty percent allowing the movement of exports into countries to be a huge success. With this in mind over the years both Canada and Mexico will also begin to eliminate quotas keeping safeguards. These safeguards will help in actions taken in increasing tariffs when damage caused by greater volumes of imports are resulting; overall keeping the industry of imports and exports to a limit of balance, while satisfying the industries but not damaging the economy.
Everyday buses are the main transportation devices used by Mexican and United States civilians. Now with the North American Trade Agreement in full effect, barriers to various land transportation services have been eliminated. Thus bringing forward new establishments of land transport with new safety standards. By the end of this year Mexico will permit buses to and from any part of the country; this advantage, will also benefit service trucks. Another important factor in the transportation service is that NAFTA will focus on safety.
This means drivers with valid licenses, and placing equipment standards to prevent the transportation of dangerous goods. The North American Free Trade Agreement has been criticized by almost everyone including those who do not know a lot about its existence. In reference towards jobs created or lost, NAFTA plays an important role. According to the United States Library of Congress, more than twice as many jobs have been created since NAFTA went into effect in 1994. On the other hand one economist in El Paso, TX, states that an estimate of 440 thousand net jobs have been lost in the United States.
On a recent meeting economists from the United States, Mexico and Canada, all met in a conference to reveal job loss and gain. Harvey Rosenblum, senior vice president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas stated, ” All three countries are better off for having NAFTA, consumers are benefiting from more efficient operations” (electric library: Library of Congress: Experts disagree on NAFTA and Jobs). In the conference the three parties agreed that many job cuts have been a result of many factories moving across the border for cheaper labor.
To prove this, economist Jesse Rothstein estimated that 1. 1 million jobs have been created in the United States while 1. 6 have been lost because of increase of imports. Furthermore, Mary Jane Bolle, a specialist in international trade states that, “Overall, NAFTA’s first five years have resulted in one and a half times as many job gains as losses” (electric library: Library of Congress). Though experts cannot agree on whether NAFTA has been good or bad for the economy, it is certain that it has benefited many areas.
In 1997, the Heritage Foundation, a research and educational institute, and the Wall Street Journal published the 1997 Index of Economic Freedom. The main focus was to find the relationships among countries with freedom and wealth. “Specifically, countries with low tariffs and insignificant non-tariff barriers were said to have freer trade policy than countries with high tariffs and significant non-tariff barriers to trade” (The Wall Street Journal; Economics: Arnold 298). During the research many countries were analyzed and given a rank of 1 through 5. Countries ranking in the range of 1 or 2 were said to be the richer countries.
Notice, once again that the trade scores indicate that the relatively rich countries have freer trade than the poor countries” [see figure 1-1] (The Wall Street Journal: Index of Economic Freedom: Arnold 298). According to the Economic Report of the President, NAFTA has been successful throughout these beginning years. As for United States, Mexico and Canada, they too have grown tremendously under the agreement. As the success continues, NAFTA will head toward new challenges including the goal of wanting the free trade area to consist of thirty four Western Hemisphere countries by the year 2005.