“To see a world in a grain of sand
And a heaven in a wild flower
Hold infinity in the palm of your hand
And eternity in an hour.”
William Blake, Auguries of Innocence
Imagination, to the people of the eighteenth century of whom William Blake and Jane Austen are but two, involves the twisting of the relationship between fantasy and reality to arrive at a fantastical point at which a world can be extrapolated from a single grain of sand, and all the time that has been and ever will be can be compressed into the space of an hour. What is proposed by Blake is clearly ludicrousit runs against the very tide of reason and senseand yet the picture that the imagination paints of his verse inspires awe.
The human imagination supplies the emotional undercurrents that allows us to see the next wild flower we pass on the side of the road in an entirely different and amazing light.
In Austens Emma, the imagination is less strenuously taxed because her story of sensibility is more easily enhanced by the imagination, more easily given life than Blakes abstract vision of the great in the small because Emma is more aesthetically realistic. However, both rely on the fact that “[t]he correspondence of world and subject is at the center of any sensibility story, yet that correspondence is often twisted in unusual and terrifying shapes,” (Edward Young, 1741).
The heroine of Austens novel, Emma Woodhouse, a girl of immense imagination, maintains it by keeping up with her reading and art because, as Young contends, these are the mediums through which imagination is chiefly expressed by manipulating the relationships between the world and the subject at hand. However, even in this, Emmas imagination falls short. “The soul might have the capacity to take in the world or the atom if it werent for the bodys limitations getting in the way,” (Joseph Addison, 1712). As Addison supposes, the limitations of Emmas body keeps her from seeing the truths that her soul, if let free, would show her. One of these is that Frank Churchill, a handsome and well-bred man, is insincere and fake, while Mr. Knightley truly loves her like no other.
In Emmas love theme, Austen shows us how emotions and imagination can augment each other. “[I]t wassensibility which originally aroused imagination;on the other handimagination increases and prolongssensibility,” (Dugald Stewart, 1792). Due to Emmas endorsement of Mr. Elton, Harriet imagines feelings for him which become so real for her that she cant get him out of her mind.
Although the situation is a tragic one, it shouldnt be believed that a fantasy-generated reality is always bad. “Sympathy, the fellow-feeling with the passions of others, operates through a logic of mirroring, in which a spectator imaginatively reconstructs the experience of the person he watches,” (Adam Smith, 1759). Emma is miserably inept at this; she completely fails to use her imagination to construct a reality for herself as might be seen through Miss Batess eyes and thus generate some sympathy for the poor womans situation. Emotions can also be enhanced by imagined details. “I saw the iron enter into his soulI burst into tearsI could not sustain the picture of confinement which my fancy had drawn,” (Laurence Sterne, 1768).
Through details, Emma stokes the fires of Harriets imagination and turns her emotions for Mr. Martin against him. Smiths idea of sympathy and Sternes idea of details come together to form “that extensive influence which language hath over the heart,strengthens the bond of society, and attracts individualsto perform acts of generosity and benevolence,” (Henry Home, Lord Kames, 1762). Language holds power through the impression from memory that it conjures, that which Kames calls “ideal presence”. Individuals in society employ details in their imagination to form a common “ideal presence” in language.
The word “love,” for example, conjures up the same group of images with most people; the word has power because it is greater than the sum of its four letters. This sympathy of meaning between one person and the next is what allows people to identify with one another and galvanizes society. It is this that allows Emma to “read between the lines” of Mr. Eltons charade and understand its underlying meaning.
Because imagination enhances emotion, but emotion often contradicts reason, imagination was also seen to oppose reason and principle. “Particular incidents and situations occur, which either throw a false light on the objects, or hinder the true from conveying to the imagination the proper sentiment and perception,” (David Hume, 1757). Hume suggests that, in order to imagine truly and effectively, the mind must be as clear as possible.
Mr. Woodhouses inability to clear his head leads him to imagine problems with the food and health of other people. Or worse, “[t]his separation of conscience from feeling is a depravity of the most pernicious sort;when the ties of the first bind the sentiment and not the will, and the rewards of the latter crown not the heart but the imagination,” individuals will take leave of reason (Henry Mackenzie, 1785).
Mackenzies concern is that the limitless freedom of imagination will seduce people out of the more disciplined act of thinking and reasoning, just as Emma is fueled by the thought of all the potential matches that she can make and ignores reason and principle which would have suggested for her to stop meddling. “Reason” can also be interpreted as the willingness to function socially, that is, to work. “Reasonable” people preoccupied with physical labor lose their ability to imagine because there is no need for it and they remain in the best of health. In contrast, “in the decline of life, [imaginers] pay dearly for the youthful days of their vanity,” (George Cheyne, 1725). Jane Fairfax does just this. She gets so carried away with the idea of Frank and Emma being together that she imagines herself into a serious illness.
To people of the eighteenth century, imagination can serve as a source of aesthetic pleasure, or it can stimulate emotional responses that enhance visual images in opposition to reason. It has the capability to wrangle the body and make it sick, to falsify emotions, and charge a language with meaning. To imagine is to blend fantasy and reality in abstract but beautiful ways, to have a mind open to ideas, and to have a hand large enough to hold in its palm all of infinity and more.
Bibliography
Addison, Joseph. The Spectator, 26 September, 1712.
Austen, Jane. Emma. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, 1993 (1816).
Blake, William. “Auguries of Innocence”. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, 1993 (c.1803).
Cheyne, George. Retrospection. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989 (1725).
Home, Henry, Lord Kames. Letter to Anthelme Brillat-Savarin. Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Oxford, 1978 (1762).
Hume, David. “On the Standard of Taste”. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, 1990 (1757).
Mackenzie, Henry. Emotions of the Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1984 (1785).
Smith, Adam. The Spectator, 27 April, 1759.
Sterne, Laurence. Tristram Shandy. Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Oxford, 1990 (1768).
Stewart, Dugald. The Process of Thought. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, 1995 (1792).
Young, Edward, “Night Thoughts”. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990 (1741).