A quantitative trait is a measurable phenotype that depends on the cumulative actions of many genes and the environment. These traits can vary among individuals, over a range, to produce a continuous distribution of phenotypes. Every one of the characteristics that we have concentrated to date fall into a couple of particular classes. These classes can be utilized to anticipate the genotypes of the people. For instance, on the off chance that we cross a tall and short pea plant and take a gander at F2 plants, we know the genotype of short plants, and we can give a summed up genotype for the tall plant phenotype. Moreover, in the event that we know the genotype we could anticipate the phenotype of the plant. These kinds of phenotypes are called broken qualities.
Different attributes don’t fall into discrete classes. Or maybe, when an isolating populace is broke down, a nonstop dissemination of phenotypes is found. A case, is ear length in corn. Dark Mexican Sweet corn has short ears, though Tom Thumb popcorn has long ears. At the point when these two innate lines are crossed, the length of the F1 ears are halfway to the two guardians. Moreover, when the F1 plants are intermated, the circulation of ear length in the F2 ranges from the short ear Black Mexican Sweet size to the Tom Thumb popcorn measure. The dissemination takes after the chime formed bend for a typical conveyance.
These kinds of characteristics are called persistent qualities and can’t be investigated in an indistinguishable way from spasmodic attributes. Since consistent attributes are frequently estimated and given a quantitative esteem, they are regularly alluded to as quantitative characteristics, and the territory of hereditary qualities that reviews their method of legacy is called quantitative hereditary qualities.
Many important agricultural traits such as crop yield, weight gain in animals, fat content of meat are quantitative traits, and much of the pioneering research into the modes of inheritance of these traits was performed by agricultural geneticists. Many human phenotypes such as IQ, learning ability and blood pressure also are quantitative traits. These traits are controlled by multiple genes, each segregating according to Mendel’s laws. These traits can also be affected by the environment to varying degrees. The following are examples of quantitative traits that we are concerned with in our daily life.
- Crop Yield
- Some Plant Disease Resistances
- Weight Gain in Animals
- Fat Content of Meat
- Learning Ability
- Blood Pressure
The rules of inheritance discovered by Mendel depended on his wisely choosing traits that varied in a clear-cut, easily distinguishable, qualitative way. But humans are not either tall or short nor are they either heavy or light. Many traits differ in a continuous, quantitative way throughout a population. This histogram shows the distribution of heights among a group of male secondary-school seniors. As you can see, the plot resembles a bell-shaped curve. Such distributions are typical of quantitative traits. Some of the variation can be explained by differences in diet and perhaps other factors in the environment. Environment alone is not, however, sufficient to explain the full range of heights or weights.
An understanding of how genes can control quantitative traits emerged in 1908 from the work of the Swedish geneticist Nilsson-Ehle who studied quantitative traits in wheat. Using Mendel’s methods, he mated pure-breeding red-kernel strains with pure-breeding white-kernel strains. The offspring were all red, but the intensity of color was much less that in the red parent. It seemed as though the effect of the red allele in the F1 generation was being modified by the presence of the white allele. When Nilsson-Ehle mated two F1 plants, he produced an F2 generation in which red-kerneled plants outnumbered white-kerneled plants 15:1. But the red kernels were not alike. They could quite easily be sorted into four categories. One sixteenth of them were deep red, like the P type. Four sixteenths were medium dark red, six sixteenths were medium red (like the F1 generation), and four sixteenths were light red.
The genetics of the two crosses is shown here. The alleles at one locus are indicated with prime marks; at the other, without. These results could be explained by assuming that kernel color in wheat is controlled by not one, but two pairs of genes, the effects of which add up without distinct dominance. Each pair is located on a different chromosome or so far apart on the same chromosome that there is no linkage. Four alleles for red produce a deep red kernel. Four alleles for white produce a white kernel. Just one red allele out of four produces a light red kernel. Any two out of the four produce a medium red kernel. Any three of the four produce a medium dark red kernel.
If one plots the numbers of the different colored offspring in the F2 generation against color intensity, one gets a graph like the one below. In other wheat varieties, Nilsson-Ehle found F2 generations with a ratio of red kernels to white of 63:1. These could be explained by assuming that three pairs of alleles were involved. In these cases, six different shades of red could be detected, but the color differences were very slight. Environmental influences also caused alterations in intensity so that in practice the collection of kernels displayed a continuous range of hues all the way from deep red to white.
So, the occurrence of continuous variation of a trait in a population can be explained by assuming it is controlled by several pairs of genes — called quantitative trait loci (QTL) — the effects of which are added together. This is called polygenic inheritance or the multiple-factor hypothesis. At first the study of quantitative traits was mostly confined to animal husbandry and the breeding of agricultural crops. It was based on the premise that when two extreme types ae mated (e.g., AABB and aabb). the offspring are intermediate in type; when two intermediate types are mated, most of their offspring are also intermediate, but some extreme types will be produced; the results of random matings in a large population will be a large range of types with the greatest number in the middle range and the fewest at the extremes.