StudyBoss » Female » Slut Shame Women Research Paper

Slut Shame Women Research Paper

When it comes to double standards, the sexual traits of men and women have to be the biggest divide. We live in an era where there are no real rules. There are little boys who do ballet and little girls who play football. There are people with rainbow hair and eccentric senses of style, needless to say we live in an era where it’s totally ok to be whatever you want to be. We can love whomever we want to love, Their are people who have no gender called being “fluid”.

So in an age where all this is accepted and celebrated, you would think it would be ok for a girl to wear a pair of shorts but it’s not. When studied statistically women were more often slut shamed without actually participating in sexual activity (EBSCO 2016). “Furthermore, qualitative data indicated that female ‘‘sluts’’ were believed to be labeled as such for lower levels of sexual behavior (e. g. , sexy clothing or dancing), than was the case for male ‘‘sluts’’ (e. g. , sex with multiple partners).

Our data indicate that individual beliefs are changing more quickly than social perceptions. EBSCO 2016)” When it comes to a woman even wearing a certain piece of clothing such as a crop top it’s shameful and “sluty”. Most school dress code state that girls can’t wear anything that shows their shoulders, but the boys are allowed into the class in a muscle tank. Leggings for women in most schools aren’t allowed, but under armour compression shorts are allowed for men. Both of which are articles of athletic clothing. My findings are supported when they go on to state “This sends an incredibly powerful message.

It teaches our children that girls’ bodies are dangerous, powerful and sexualized, and that boys are biologically programmed to objectify and harass them. It prepares them for college life, where as many as one in five women are sexually assaulted, but society will victim blame and question and silence them, while the perpetrators are rarely disciplined. ” (Laura 2015) The problem is often compounded by a lack of any attempt to discipline the boys for harassing behavior, which drives home the message that it is the victim’s responsibility to prevent.

We have received thousands of testimonies from girls who have complained about being verbally harassed, touched, groped, chased, followed, licked, and assaulted at school, only to be told: “He just likes you”, or: “boys will be boys”. The hypocrisy is breathtaking. (Laura 2015)”. If society is sexualizing a girl’s shoulders the problem isn’t the tank top it’s society. Telling women that they can’t wear certain things because it distracts the boys is what is encouraging rape culture and men to slut shame women. Controlling what a woman can wear is just the beginning of all the other problems that are caused by this thinking in society.

In school, it’s girls can’t wear tank tops. Then in the future it’s 70 cents to every man’s dollar and the encouragement of rape culture by saying that she was asking for it by wearing a skirt. With the way things are today, if we can bump into a boy in the girl’s room, then my dress can have a short hemline if I so chose. Especially in a school setting where it’s suppose to be a comfortable and safe learning environment not at a club where a person has to watch their attire to not attract negative attention. A school should be for learning not a place for a teacher to look for a date.

Even in a case where young women are put in dangerous situations such as a student/ teacher relationship. When it comes to student/teacher relationships people don’t often think much of it or that it should be considered rape because the young adult was “consenting” . However if there is a 30 year old man dating a 15 year old girl it’s inappropriate and shouldn’t be happening under any circumstances. An underdeveloped adolescent mind doesn’t have the common sense yet to know that what they are doing is wrong. This tells you everything about their reliability in decision making.

However, this is by no means blaming the victim because even if only a year in age difference it is inappropriate for an adult to try to begin a relationship with an adolescent. The person that is going along with a child’s game and calling it a relationship is clearly lacking in maturity putting the young adult at risk. Nonetheless, on the other side of the spectrum, if a woman was 30 having a sexual relationship with a boy that was 15, even in court a judge would say it is fine, and there is evidence of these court case findings where a woman was given a profoundly smaller sentence for raping a boy than a man was for raping a girl. Howell 2011)

The injustice that happens here is that a male judge actually thought that this woman didn’t do anything wrong. The judge simply states that he was satisfying his sexual needs with this teacher. On the other hand a male teacher was accused of making this young innocent girl a woman well before her time and it was the same situation. “A 43-year-old female teacher named Pamela Diehl-Moore was convicted of having an inappropriate sexual relationship with a 13-year-old male student.

Although her behavior qualifies as statutory rape in the state of New Jersey—punishable by 5 to 10 years in prison—Diehl Moore received a sentence of only 5 years probation for her actions. The judge justified his ruling by stating that ‘I really don’t see the harm that was done here . . . and certainly society doesn’t need to be worried. ’ In his words, the student was simply “[satisfying] his sexual needs,” and therefore the judge failed to find anything ‘that show[ed] this young man [had] been psychologically damaged by [Diehl-Moore’s] actions’ (Kupelian, 2006).

By contrast, James Darden, a 36-year-old male teacher in New Jersey, was given 8. 5 years in prison (with lifelong -parole) for having an inappropriate sexual relationship with a 13-year-old female student. Moreover, Darden was required to register as a sex offender, then surrender his teaching license, and had all employment in the public sector revoked (Markos, 2008). Following the pronouncement of Darden’s sentence, the presiding judge said to Darden, “You realize what you have done to this child? You made her a woman well before her time in a very inappropriate way. ’ (Howell 2011).

When it come to teachers dating students it’s something that just shouldn’t be going on because it’s at the workplace. It should be illegal for both sexes because both sexes are doing the same thing. It is rape in any case because they are adolescents. Moreover they aren’t mentally developed enough to make those kind of decisions. When we see the research that has been done it’s astounding to see how in most literature, the woman who is sexually promiscuous is considered a harlot, and a man who is sexually promiscuous is considered charming and “the man”.

There is a gender bias when it comes to males and females who are sexually promiscuous in layman’s terms, It’s okay for men to be trollops and shameful for a woman to even look attractive. “Although there has been a modernization of views on sexuality since the feminist movement emerged, traditional characteristics can still be identified among modern values and experiences (Bordini 2012). Therefore, there might be different rules and values related to sexuality, depending on the individual’s gender.

This is called sexual double standard, that is, the acceptance of different criteria to assess the sexuality of men and women. A recent study conducted with Brazilian adolescents showed, for instance, that peers and parents still condemn women who actively express their sexuality and men who do not do it. In 1956, Ira Reiss began a series of publications about the double standard in premarital sexual intercourse. In his first article, he argued that this double standard was only one of the dimensions of a general double standard of male–female relationships involving many areas beyond sexuality (Reiss 1956).

Within the field of sexuality, Reiss suggested the existence of standards that regulate other aspects in addition to premarital sexual intercourse, such as adultery, homosexuality and masturbation. Reiss defined the premarital sexual double standard as a social standard establishing that premarital sexual intercourse is wrong for women, whereas it is allowed—or right—for men. “Based on this difference, women who are sexually active before marriage are socially frowned upon, while this is not true for men. ”(Bordini 2012).

Within these findings we can see, that with certainty, there is still a sexual double standard that exist among men and women and society. When girls are young, women have to watch the choices they make or girls could be facing a lifetime of persecution for wearing a short skirt. Women have also learned that men will get to be as sexual promiscuous as they would like and there will never be any kind of shame that comes along with a man being a “player”. However this is what the research has proven to be true the final statement that men are free and women are still oppressed a harsh but true statement.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.