StudyBoss » Elections » Rhetorical Analysis Of The Speech By Susan B. Anthony "Women’S Right To Vote"

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Speech By Susan B. Anthony "Women’S Right To Vote"

Table of Contents

Rhetorical Analysis of Women’s Right to Vote

All through history, there have been numerous talks that have numerous and enormous effect on society, however one that will never be overlooked is the speech by Susan B. Anthony, “On Women’s Right to Vote.” This speech is in the greatest speeches in history because of the message it sent to the citizens and residents of the United States and the way it was said. The speech had feelings and additionally logic and for the most part its validity. The way it changed America and the manner in which numerous individuals thought is the reason I came to believe that the speech by Anthony is an extraordinary method to break down a motivational speech by using ethos, pathos and logos.

The manner in which Anthony built up these things in her speech by having documentation to explain her facts, and additionally the manner in which she talks from her point of view as a’ lady is captivating. From the beginning of her speech, Anthony gives evidence to her facts and her credibility, or ethos. After being fined, 100 dollars for having to vote back in her day without the right to women voting and coming in front of the government explaining why such actions of her were ok and why she declined to pay. In her speech, Anthony states “I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen’s rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny.” (On Women’s Rights to Vote)

By giving such proof, she is the one to fabricate a strong auxiliary base on her point that she is a citizen of the United States, in this way, nobody can deny her the privilege to vote. This offers something to back up her speech in an issue that nobody can claim that she was not right or deny since it is a documentation that based the privileges surprisingly and made America not the same as other countries. Anthony also explains how “It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.” (On Women’s Right to Vote). What she was trying to get across was that by the Declaration saying “We” the people means everybody that made America, not simply men but rather ladies of the United States. This makes people re-think and move towards the way that yes, without a doubt women ought to have a similar privileges, all things considered, we are all the same and equal and were given similar rights, regardless of the sex, yet the place you are born and made.With such an excess of being stated, Anthony reached to her point by using logos, or logic.

The logic behind her address is as straightforward as saying that the Declaration of Independence expresses that “We” the people of the United States, not just “not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union,” as indicated by Anthony. In addition to the fact that she is giving something for the audience to consider with that she stands out enough to be noticed recognizing her and her facts. She is using the declaration and also Webster by expressing “Webster, Worcester, and Bouvier all define a citizen to be a person in the United States, entitled to vote and hold office” (On Women’s Right to Vote).

By this not exclusively is she using one document yet a few, giving the listeners an approach to realize that she is not just influencing things to up and demonstrating her knowledge as some other individual, not simply men. The explanation for this is to make the gathering of people, generally the men, have something to not fight back and sooner or later make her vision come true, or as we these days know, it worked out by giving ladies the privilege to vote, and every other person that is a native or citizen of the United States.Lastly, however not the least, Susan B. Anthony uses pathos, for the most part know as feelings or emotions, in her speech to make it a powerful and dependable speech, that made it into the best addresses ever.

The feeling of which I say are the feelings that originate from Anthony, a lady in the 1870’s which is powerful enough to fight for her rights against the authorities of government and all the men of the United States and give out her opinions from her point of view. The feelings of which, I, the reader see are solid powerful words with dependable facts and additionally the effort in which ladies had no say at anything. An approach to understand this is by a simple statement of hers “The only question left to be settled now is: Are women persons?” (On Women’s Right to Vote). This is to make understand that ladies deserve a greater amount of right and be equivalent as men.

Questioning the audience is an approach to get to people, making them think and blend those idea with feelings making an approach to get not simply to their thoughts but rather emotions and influencing them to acknowledge they have been very wrong for quite a while. But lastly Anthony says, “To them, this government has no just powers derived from the consent of the governed. To them this government is not a democracy. It is not a republic. It is an odious aristocracy” (On Women’s Right to Vote). This was a major effect on the speech and a major turn since it manages the way in which the government was about.

By Anthony saying this, she is practically saying that the government is not an equivalent government as proposed by the fathers of America yet by the way it was heading towards in the event that it does not give ladies a chance to vote and be equivalent. This was not to be taken by granted and hit the people with an acknowledgment.For this and significantly more, Susan B Anthony’s speech On Women’s Right to Vote was a major turn on the privilege of ladies and the way government see towards ladies. The use of pathos, ethos, and logos is the thing that made this speech a powerful speech in history of ladies and the United States, giving ladies their rights, people acknowledging what ladies deserve and the manner in which things ought to be run.

The feelings in her speech that made people tune in to Anthony and the logic, for example, giving basic rights as what America depended on was the way in which she won and fought. Also credibility, the manner in which a lady would talk in front of hundreds and for millions to hear her and to see her perspective as a lady without any rights, however that was resolved to get the rights as an American she deserves. But mostly, because of being fined for voting without the privilege from the government, and as yet paying such fine, she over all changed the way in which individuals saw ladies, even right up until the present time.

Work Cited:

1. Susan B. Anthony. “On Women’s Right to Vote.” Expanding the Arc: From Argument to Analysis. By Robert Miller, Bryan Kyser, and Steve Sansom. Southlake, TX: Fountainhead, 2016. 375-6.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Leave a Comment