When it comes to seeking a job, many people focus on their appearance. They want to make sure they look presentable and put their best foot forward. But what happens when that focus on appearance goes too far?
In his book “The Big Squeeze: Tough Times for the American Worker,” Steven Greenhouse discusses the issue of discrimination against workers who don’t conform to certain standards of dress and grooming. He argues that while employers have always had some expectations for how their employees should look, the pressure to meet these standards has increased in recent years.
This pressure can be especially tough for low-wage workers, who may not be able to afford to buy the clothes or get the haircuts required by their employers.
In his book The Big Squeeze, journalist Steven Greenhouse explores how employees are expected to conform to impossible beauty criteria. He thinks that this pressure might result in workplace prejudice, as employers may favor workers who meet certain physical standards.
Greenhouse cites the example of a woman who was fired from her job after she gained weight. The woman, who had previously been praised for her work, was told by her boss that she was no longer “fitting the image” of the company. Greenhouse argues that such cases are becoming more common as companies increasingly value appearances over ability.
He also points to research which shows that attractive people are more likely to be hired and promoted than their less-attractive counterparts. This, he says, can create a “self-fulfilling prophecy” in which the most attractive employees are given more opportunities to succeed, while those who are seen as less attractive are passed over.
Greenhouse concludes that the pressure to conform to unrealistic standards of beauty is having a harmful effect on workers, leading to discrimination and creating a divide between the haves and have-nots. He calls on companies to focus on hiring and promoting based on ability, not appearance.
The article “Going for the Look, But Risking Discrimination,” by Steven Greenhouse from the New York Times was read. I disagree with Cohen’s assertion since it is hurtful and unjust to intelligence, experience, and personality. Perhaps they don’t have the skills or talents to do the job of the firm. The company will then fall even further behind.
If a company is like that, it will not go far. In today’s job market, many employers are increasingly focused on hiring employees who are not only qualified for the job, but also fit the company’s image. This trend has led to discrimination against applicants who may be perfectly qualified for the job, but don’t fit the company’s desired “look.”
This type of discrimination is unfair and can lead to talented and qualified individuals being passed over for jobs they are more than capable of doing. It also puts pressure on employees to conform to a certain look in order to keep their jobs, which can lead to an unhealthy work environment. Companies should focus on hiring the best candidates for the job, regardless of their appearance.
Talent is the most costly thing of the 21st century. As a result, only attractive individuals will be able to help the organization become more affordable. Abercrombie is providing a poor example for Americans and what people should look like. I believe that Abercrombie has misplaced its way. You can’t judge someone based on their looks alone. Everyone has an equal opportunity of obtaining any position, not just those who “project” the company image.
Abercrombie is not the only company doing this. Hiring someone based on their looks is Discrimination. Steven Greenhouse wrote an article called “Going for the Look but Risking Discrimination” which talks about how Abercrombie is being sued for Discrimination. He also talks about other companies that are being sued for Discrimination. This is a big problem in America and it needs to be stopped.
“Going for the Look, but Risking Discrimination” by Steven Greenhouse from the New York Times is a good example. My reaction to Cohen’s viewpoint is that it is harmful and unjust. Abercrombie is setting a poor example for America with his appearance. I believe that Abercrombie has lost his way.
Abercrombie is not only judged on their looks, but they are also judged on their personality and intelligence. People who do not have the “look” that Abercrombie is looking for are often told that they are not good enough, or that they do not have the right look. This can be very hurtful and discouraging to people who are trying to get a job with Abercrombie.
Abercrombie is also setting a bad example for America. America is already obsessed with looks and image, and Abercrombie is just adding to this problem. People should be judged on their character and abilities, not on their looks.
There’s no such thing as “racist hiring.” You can’t just choose someone based on their appearance; everyone has a chance of obtaining any position, regardless of how they look or what race they are. In fact, companies like Abercrombie & Fitch and L’oreal Cosmetics to Mac Cosmetics and Hollister Co all employ the same marketing techniques, which is wrong because it represents a regression in time when African Americans were unable to use the same drinking fountains or attend the same schools as Anglos.
For example, Steven Greenhouse wrote in the New York Times that Abercrombie & Fitch had to pay $50 million to settle lawsuits claiming that it discriminated against minority job applicants and workers. The company was also accused of targeting its marketing only to white customers.
Similarly, L’Oréal was sued for allegedly excluding black and Hispanic women from its advertising. And Hollister was criticized for only hiring thin, white models to work in its stores.
While companies certainly have a right to market their products however they see fit, they should be aware that discriminating against certain groups of people is not only morally wrong, but it can also lead to costly legal troubles.